作者 主题: [4e]关于精华版跟老4e的混用规则  (阅读 3698 次)

副标题:

离线 poorlunch

  • Diver
  • ******
  • 帖子数: 2371
  • 苹果币: 2
Re: [4e]关于精华版跟老4e的混用规则
« 回帖 #10 于: 2011-08-11, 周四 18:13:34 »
唔,这个当然不是误导。对新手我相信会很有帮助。
只是通常来说,我做翻译的时候倾向于不要随意增加原文,因为会导致难以分辨出处。其实写一下译注之类表示是添加说明就好了  :em004
所谓便当,就是没有主角模板的围观群众们人手一份的洗具……
----------
16:48:30 <DnDBot> 史龙 投掷 神秘: 1d20+11=(2)+11=13
16:49:13 <史龙> (杯具了。。。
16:49:18 <朗读者> : 你感到这里似乎有某种魔法,可是完全没法判断具体位置和种类。
16:49:38 <史龙> “小不点,你来试试,这个仓库有点古怪。”
16:49:54 * 史龙 戳了戳密云。
16:49:56 <DnDBot> 密云 投掷 神秘: 1d20+8=(4)+8=12
16:50:18 * 密云 也很无奈
16:50:32 * 史龙 又戳了戳本杰明。
16:50:41 <DnDBot> 本杰明 投掷 神秘: 1d20+13=(1)+13=14
16:50:49 <露丝特> (你们啊……
16:50:55 <露丝特> (我应该说啥……
16:51:06 <DnDBot> 拓瓦爾德 投掷 神秘: 1d20+3=(19)+3=22
16:51:24 * 拓瓦爾德 幸好自己也讀過幾本奧法書
16:52:38 * 本杰明 蹲在墙角画圈圈
--------

很多人需要的4E车卡器

无证量贩便当车

离线 Snow Patrol

  • 破邪显正
  • Diver
  • ******
  • 帖子数: 3473
  • 苹果币: 0
    • weibo
Re: [4e]关于精华版跟老4e的混用规则
« 回帖 #11 于: 2011-08-12, 周五 03:26:05 »
OTHER SOURCES
Other DUNCEONS & DRACONS supplements, including DUNGEONS & DRAGONS
Insider
, offer additional powers that you can choose from. Whenever you choose
a new class power; you can select it from the list presented In this book or
you can take a power of the same class, level, and type (attack or utility) from
another source.
For example. when your slayer reaches 2nd level. you could select a 2nd· level
fighter utility power from a source other than this book or you could choose one
of the 2nd-level flghter utility powers in the "Knight" section of this book.
M: I don't know how to put this to you, but trainspotters do have a certain reputation.
T: Which reputation are you thinking of?
M: Well... maybe for being a little bit dull?
T: I think you become involved to an extent that you ignore the real world outside. You come into your own little world and you have many people who join you in that, whether they're interested in mechanics, interested in the actual observations, interested in the operations. They all have their own little interest. But it means that we're committed to what we enjoy.
M: A little obsessive, then? You will admit to a little obsessive, would you?
T: I think obsessive, possibly, yes. Certainly not dull.